Arguments

Creationist Argument #65


Argument

"Evolution cannot explain the complexity of the human eye."

Rebuttal

Darwin actually laid out a sequence for eyeball evolution more than a hundred years ago. Like so many other creationist claims about the limitations of evolution theory, this one is simply false.

Think about this: there are eyes of varying complexity in millions of species across Earth right now. How can anyone seriously believe that there is no conceivable evolutionary sequence for the eyeball when we can see eyes of various complexity in living creatures right now?

Fallacy watch:

Search Database Again

Search for key words:

Exact keyword search

Search Notes:

Page generated: 2019-11-21


Continue to Young-Earth Creationism

Jump to: